<- 1,  2,  3,  4,  5 ->
^^
vv
List results:
Search options:
Use \ before commas in usernames
SABERinBLUE
2005-03-19 11:51:55 am
Cook of the Sea
Quote from Nida:
GIMP > all.

And subDark > all.

Perhaps the two should fight it out for the all-time championship?


REQUEST'D
arkarian
2005-03-19 11:56:47 am
red chamber dream
Hehe...can't wait to see how this one plays out.
SABERinBLUE
2005-03-19 11:57:46 am
Cook of the Sea
Already up.  8)
gleepdiddly
2005-03-19 11:57:47 am
Does Nida have a picture of this GIMP?
nate
2005-03-19 12:04:14 pm
i think it looks good?
SABERinBLUE
2005-03-19 12:09:24 pm
Cook of the Sea
A picture of the GIMP?  Dude, just download it.  Or you can see a very small version in the Paintness I just did.  Either way, it's a very good graphics editor, especially for being free.
gleepdiddly
2005-03-19 12:29:35 pm
I noticed that Nate put the logo for Metroid 2002 which we talked about before, but WHERE can I download the gimp?
SABERinBLUE
2005-03-19 12:30:13 pm
Cook of the Sea
Google.
gleepdiddly
2005-03-19 01:03:04 pm
Alright, I went to google, typed in gimp, clicked the first one, but then I don't know where to go. Where do I go?
Skreemaster
2005-03-19 01:06:50 pm
I'll be back. Maybe...
... Has anyone else noticed how the poll %s add up to 98?

Anyway, you go :

Behold!
gleepdiddly
2005-03-19 01:15:17 pm
Thanks Skreemaster, I like it!
Chanoire
2005-03-19 04:02:23 pm
Well, all that certainly explains why suddenly the forum logo has an ugly white background in my nice screen of mostly gray and black now... in IE, anyway.  Looks fine in Mozilla.  Can the old pic be used for the smartDark style?
gleepdiddly
2005-03-19 05:01:00 pm
If you mean the new Metroid2002 logo for the boards, yes it is there and changed in SmartDark. If you don't, tell me which old pic.
Skreemaster
2005-03-19 05:55:22 pm
I'll be back. Maybe...
Yet another reason why IE is awful.
Yoshi348
2005-03-19 06:50:50 pm
PAGE BREAKER
Ready and willing.
I thought I heard transparent .png support being thrown around as one of the rumored features of IE 7...
Chanoire
2005-03-19 07:34:52 pm
It seems to be fine now.

Yay for obligatory, irrelevant bashing.  Rolling Eyes
nate
2005-03-20 03:48:06 am
i thought it could be more like he was just marking reasons down in his head, things he maybe had heard before but never experienced so intimately, to prepare a more complete list. i know i did some of that yesterday.
Yoshi348
2005-03-20 04:31:05 pm
PAGE BREAKER
Ready and willing.
Sorry, I got lost... what post was that refering to?
Chanoire
2005-03-20 05:16:05 pm
My bashing comment was in reference to Skreemaster's.  I'm not sure about Nate's.
Skreemaster
2005-03-20 05:20:31 pm
I'll be back. Maybe...
It's fine now because the old image is back for smartDark. If you look at the edges of the red circle on the logo, you'll notice the difference.
nate
2005-03-20 05:20:39 pm
heh, yeah, i knew that post had a high "probably only comprehensible by nathan" value before i sent it, but i guess sometimes i'm curious to see if there are any particularly sharp ones in the crowd.

i was referring to skreemaster's "obligatory, irrelevant bashing," perhaps providing a bit of pathos. i can see where he's coming from in terms of ie's faults being probably too many to count.
Skreemaster
2005-03-20 05:22:32 pm
I'll be back. Maybe...
I knew exactly what you were talking about.

At least IE doesn't cost £170... unlike Windows. Don't they have enough money already?
tomatobob
2005-03-20 05:27:23 pm
One shall stand, one shall ball.
Bill gates could probably build a time machine and go back 12 years then retire at that time and still not need to work ever again.
Chanoire
2005-03-20 05:29:34 pm
And yet I seem to recall from some posted site statistics that a majority of viewers use IE, and therefore things not working properly in that browser should be mentioned.  Rolling Eyes  I was hesitant to do so exactly because of this reaction.  It gets really old.

I was pretty sure I knew what Nate meant, but didn't agree with it; I thought Skreemaster was just being negative.
nate
2005-03-20 05:31:43 pm
yeah, probably, but i can still daydream. ;)