Quote from USBCD36:
awesome
Those suits look crazy good. As does Dark Samus.
Archived M2K2 Forum
I do believe these are the ones I got good to go:
These just looked better without transparent backgrounds, in my opinion:
And these I lack the technology to give transparent backgrounds to. For some reason... Perhaps someone more GIMP/Photoshop talented than me can git r dun.
And the rest are doing that annoying white border thing. I'm working on 'em, but they may take a while.
These just looked better without transparent backgrounds, in my opinion:
And these I lack the technology to give transparent backgrounds to. For some reason... Perhaps someone more GIMP/Photoshop talented than me can git r dun.
And the rest are doing that annoying white border thing. I'm working on 'em, but they may take a while.
Ok, done!
Well not entirely…
After making "Amorbis2.jpg" into the small, cut out version, I made the mistake of not saving a PSD, and when I closed it, I realized that my test layer had been activated, and so it has a black background. My second one turned out very badly, and that was when I decided not to do it anymore.
Still, the other two aren't bad. I discarded the DTM outer glow and reapplied one myself instead. Worked out very nicely…
Well not entirely…
After making "Amorbis2.jpg" into the small, cut out version, I made the mistake of not saving a PSD, and when I closed it, I realized that my test layer had been activated, and so it has a black background. My second one turned out very badly, and that was when I decided not to do it anymore.
Still, the other two aren't bad. I discarded the DTM outer glow and reapplied one myself instead. Worked out very nicely…
After an hour of stitching images together, I have determined that it wasn't smart to try it in the first place. The only reason I did it was because some of the MP2E pics I wanted to make into avatars were not entirely suitable for the purpose, so I made hi-res versions. It also gave me one more reason to hate interlaced video. Here's what I got though…
Or this:
And for those who don't like that one…
Or this:
And for those who don't like that one…
Question - the last several posts contain .png avatars with light gray rectangles for backgrounds. Like this:
I'm using Internet Explorer as my browser. Do these avatars show as transparent bkg for people using other browsers (Firefox, etc)? I'm just wondering if IE doesn't support .png transparency. I know for the few transparent avvies I've made, if I save as a transparent .png they do NOT appear transparent on my browser, whereas if I save as a transparent .gif they do.
I'm using Internet Explorer as my browser. Do these avatars show as transparent bkg for people using other browsers (Firefox, etc)? I'm just wondering if IE doesn't support .png transparency. I know for the few transparent avvies I've made, if I save as a transparent .png they do NOT appear transparent on my browser, whereas if I save as a transparent .gif they do.
Quote from USBCD36:
Correct. IE does NOT support PNG transparency, whereas Firefox, Safari, and others do. One more reason to get another browser!
Very true - but on my work computer, I doubt the network admins would appreciate me trying to download and install a new browser. Plus, I probably don't even have the administrative privileges to do so. :(
...
Now I just wish I could see the rest of those avatars with transparency. Those 2 Quadraxis avatars look sweet indeed.
