<- 1  -   of 3455 ->
^^
vv
List results:
Search options:
Use \ before commas in usernames
Quote from Toozin:
But without cops who will shoot all the black people?


dre
I'll get my coat
One shall stand, one shall ball.
I laughed.
It's discussions like these that made Alexander Hamilton dislike the idea of a bill of rights.
One shall stand, one shall ball.
He probs really regretted the gun thing there at the end.
On the contrary, he disliked it because he believed it would inevitably lead to government policy trying to get as close as possible to doing something unconstitutional without actually do it.
Not impossible
just highly unlikely
Little did he know that eventually they'd just flat out break the constitution and not sweat it too much.
Unwarranted searches and seizures? What are those?
I dunno. Call me a nutjob all you want, but I actually don't oppose the second amendment all that much. Racial violence and crooked cops may suck, but it's nothing on the scale of what oppressive governments can do.
One shall stand, one shall ball.
The amendment itself isn't the issue so much as the people that tend to champion it like it was handed down by God himself.
Well, a lot of times with these kinds of issues it's really hard to separate the ideology from the adherents.
Not impossible
just highly unlikely
I may have a criminal record and a mental illness but DON'T TAKE MAH GUN SECOND AMENDMENT!
One shall stand, one shall ball.
Like the fact that any attempt to implement safeguards being outright rejected as a brutal attack on our rights as humans is absurd.

At a certain point repealing it becomes preferable because if you aren't allowed to properly regulate the trade of weapons within reason, you've got a serious issue.
red chamber dream
i'm opposed to it because it doesn't appear to do anything useful and instead appears to have caused harm

there's probably nothing to be done about all the guns in this country now though
It's never done anything useful because this country's been lucky enough to never have a situation where it would.
One shall stand, one shall ball.
Real talk, California gun laws are considered 'strict' because we require rifles with detachable magazines to have a system in place to make reloading take slightly longer. For example, a cover over the button that drops out the magazine that requires a 'tool' to lift. The tool can of course just be a spare bullet. How strict!


That's where we're at. It's very silly.
One shall stand, one shall ball.
Quote from Idkbutlike2:
It's never done anything useful because this country's been lucky enough to never have a situation where it would.

It had one. That's how it got in the constitution. :v
Oh come on, the US didn't even formally exist at that point. :P
Not impossible
just highly unlikely
There's such a boner for guns that it's somehow become a part of our national identity. It boggles my mind.

I don't have a problem with responsible people owning guns but the fact that we're averaging like one mass shooting a week shows that we need stricter restrictions on them. And somehow people think that means the G-Men are going to bust down their doors and take away their licenced firearms. It's absurd.
One shall stand, one shall ball.
And we've been shooting each other ever since! <3
Club 27 Goals
Everyone who owns a gun should be required by law to shoot at one other person who owns a gun. whoever lives is the better Gunman and can keep his gun.
Club 27 Goals
I say his instead of his/her because no woman should ever own a gun
Honestly, women are probably safer off owning guns than men are at this point.
red chamber dream
Quote from Idkbutlike2:
It's never done anything useful because this country's been lucky enough to never have a situation where it would.

yeah because citizens owning guns would really stop the government now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
red chamber dream
Quote from Poision Envy:
Everyone who owns a gun should be required by law to shoot at one other person who owns a gun. whoever lives is the better Gunman and can keep his gun.

haha