page  <- 1234567891011 -> <- 1 ... 10, 11 ->
^^
vv
List results:
Search options:
Use \ before commas in usernames


Really disappointed with this run. Could have cut 1:40 had I not choked away 3 minutes like an idiot. Oh well, I was overdue for a PB anyway.
Not sure why people keep posting here instead of the times topic...
Blame the fact that we still have two "Best Times"-esque threads in the first place, and the fact that nobody can ever seem to decide which thread should be used for posting said Best Times.
I vote we post in the topic titled "Post your fastest times here".
This could be kept for leaderboards discussion, and what miles said for posting times.
But that would be the logical thing to do! We can't possibly have that!
you're right, I'll create a third topic to make things even more illogical (no I won't).
Quote from TheMG2:
The spliced 16 star runs in SM64 prove that runners involved in the community could be just as prone to cheating.


Really? Which run is that?
http://www.reddit.com/r/speedrun/comments/2g0tue/sm64_16star_akikan_and_whitearis_times_removed/
Edit history:
MrSpEeDrUn: 2014-12-21 05:27:24 pm
MP2 also a bit MP1 speedrunning
axon64 has got a 1:46 single segment that seems not to be listed anywhere yet
I took care of that
Edit history:
MrSpEeDrUn: 2014-12-26 08:40:07 am
MP2 also a bit MP1 speedrunning
I don't really like the google spreadsheet tbh, because the segmented and the single segment times are all mixed up now and it looks like the single segment runs seem a lot worse than they actually are, those should defenitly not be in the same list.
loving low%
Oh and if you're already at it, you might as well update that 22% normal mode segmented WR: by craztad and it's a 4 minute improvement over his 1:17 that had beaten the previous WR of 1:18 by Trebor. In his 1:13 run, he COMBINED some segments so he could save time by NOT using so many savestations. The craziest timesaver he made by doing this was COMBINING THOSE TWO SEGMENTS: He did the Vent Shaft and Geo Core (IN-BOUNDS) Segments in one go and it made him so crazy that he finally accepted a segment where he got the bomb slot stall on 2nd try (<-- still batshit insane) after a nice vent shaft segment. Yeah so that's what he told me. Fyi, I wrote in his chat on twich as he was OUT OF NOWHERE randomly streaming some Mertroid Prime (INDEED!!!) and I was like "oh let's ask him about that time that some have spoken about". This was like 2-3 months ago or so. Never saw him streaming Metroid Prime at anytime except for that. (I hope this memory is not from a dream but from what some of us might call "reality" :p)

If you read this: Congratz on the 1:13 and congratz on the Vent Shaft + Geo Core segment in one go! :)
What's his twitch handle?
loving low%
http://www.twitch.tv/craztad/profile
Why does no video or even screenshot of this exist anywhere? You have to understand that people would be skeptical of a WR 5 minutes better than anybody else with no proof.
R Web's any% 1:08 is still listed alongside his 1:05.
Edit history:
Skull64: 2014-12-28 12:55:19 am
Skull64: 2014-12-28 12:54:42 am
At some point I'm going to split the leaderboards into separate documents for each game, and make separate sheets for segmented and SS. As it stands right now it just isn't feasible to have separate sheets for segmented and SS since there would be far too many sheets.
Edit history:
Daryoshi: 2014-12-28 11:40:52 am
loving low%
Quote:
Why does no video or even screenshot of this exist anywhere? You have to understand that people would be skeptical of a WR 5 minutes better than anybody else with no proof.
Yeah I can understand that it's crazy that there's no video proof or even JUST A PICTURE. He might have a crappy picture taken with his mobile phone somewhere but I think it doesn't matter to him if it's listed or not since (to my eye) he didn't behave like he wants us to list it. He just told me as I asked him. Sadly, I can't remember too much of the conversation anymore. Well, he holds the WR anyway since T3 made a post that craztads 1:17 is legit and there's proof for it or at least a picture, idk, it's apparently enough to make T3 trust him on that. Why would he lie to us if he's always been trusted and now he's not even part of the active community anymore (afaik). I think it's ok if you put a question mark or something next to the 1:13. List it or don't list it. I don't think craztad even cares too much about this.


EDIT: Seems like you forgot about MPzoids former WR in the PAL frigate not long ago.
red chamber dream
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18mZo_0cBX1X3Wf2zYB6g1B6wsFqISNL3UD9W9qPTwHQ/edit#gid=548001460

the name of this sheet and the table title don't match.
rocks, locks, and invisible blocks
under "trilogy version" on the "dank memes" page you should probably put my name.
What does everybody think of 22% becoming a category again? It's the perfect combination of speed and survival. It's completely different than 21%, and also very different from the standard Any%. I just want thoughts; I don't expect huge changes or anything.
Quote from JustinDM:
What does everybody think of 22% becoming a category again? It's the perfect combination of speed and survival. It's completely different than 21%, and also very different from the standard Any%. I just want thoughts; I don't expect huge changes or anything.

not sure how comparable this is, but most people who do low% runs in fusion still do 1% runs, just because 0% is ridiculous. if enough people run it, it's probably worth adding to the leaderboards.
Quote from BioSpark:
Quote from JustinDM:
What does everybody think of 22% becoming a category again? It's the perfect combination of speed and survival. It's completely different than 21%, and also very different from the standard Any%. I just want thoughts; I don't expect huge changes or anything.

not sure how comparable this is, but most people who do low% runs in fusion still do 1% runs, just because 0% is ridiculous. if enough people run it, it's probably worth adding to the leaderboards.


I'm fine with it, doesn't reallya ffect me. As long as people don't call it low%