It is extremely important I get to play this video game as soon as possible, if you're gonna delay for any reason it you might as well tell me I have AIDS!
Maybe. It feels like every time there's some new console from a unknown developer it either gets 0 support from game makers or it's a scam. It could be good but I'll believe it when it's out.
well this looks like something targeted toward indie developers, and it seems like they'd jump on that shit. clearly lots of people are interested in it, having funded the thing for over $1.6 mil, so it would make sense for indie devs to want to develop for it. at any rate, like i said, i'll wait and see if there's enough decent games before buying.
True, but indie developers also already have steam and the mobile market, so it depends on how many would consider starting to develop for a new platform, which depends on how many would buy it, which depends on if there are good games on it. So they'll have to hope that enough developers take that risk to make it an attractive console.
Then again I don't actually know shit about stuff like this, but that sounds like something which could happen.
well, it's based on android (meaning android devs will likely not have to change their code at all, or very little), so it's not like it's a totally new proprietary thing like the gizmondo was. i can see this thing being pretty successful, if only because of its price.
hell, if even a few good indie devs who normally make pc games decide to develop for this thing i'd buy it immediately, because i'd much rather play games on my tv than my pc.
So how come you guys haven't been talking about the EU court's ruling that people should be able to sell their "used" digital games?
On one hand, I'd love for this to take effect on steam since I have a shitload of games on there I'll never touch. And the fact that it would also mean being able to buy a game for way way cheaper.
On the other hand, this would absolutely kill the devs that make short single player games, like Bastion and Limbo, since people would just sell it once they beat it, since there's no good reason to hold onto it.
Generally speaking, I like the idea, primarily because I could offload a load of stuff I'll never play, like acquisitions through bundles and stuff. I'm with Ark on the never selling front, as I've never sold / traded anything.
but why don't you? I can understand it a little with a physical game, they're always there, you look at them, and there's no easy way to really sell them. And buying them used is annoying because you never know if the manual is going to be all torn up or if the disc will be scratched etc.
But with digital games they're just a line of text in your steam inventory, and buying them used would be exactly the same as buying them new. Take any of the call of duty games, there's tons of people that would play them for the single player story that don't give a shit about the multiplayer. If you could get Black Ops for $5, beat the single player, and turn around and sell it for $5, why not? You won't be playing it again.
yeah but with that $5 you could just, you know, buy another game.
But anyhow, I jsut think it's an interesting thing going on since the game industry is already putting up a fit about used games killing the industry, so it'll be interesting to see how they combat this. Maybe mountains of DLC every month to make people want to hold onto their copy.